Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Greg Sazima's avatar

What a comprehensive piece- Thanks. Here’s the dystopian part- will insurers toss tau-217 positives off coverage, as these patients will be more expensive going forward, sooner or later?

Expand full comment
Nancy J Hess's avatar

I have been following your work recently and up until this point formed the opinion that it is better to live optimally to prevent disease and let the chips fall where they may. But what you suggest today makes me lean more toward testing.

I know from taking the Huntington's Gene test that it can be very stressful and although my results were favorable, other family members were not so lucky. When I tested, I thought that course of action was a no-brainer. Most people who have not stared down that barrel do. But now I have a much different view. As the youngest in the family who tested positive said, "if I didn't test, I could have maintained 50% hope. Now I have none."

Here I am again staring down the barrel of another gun. (APOE4) But much later in life, and although some say different, I refuse to believe it is determinative. AND what I read here today is that beyond the lifestyle factors, we are close to interventions that will at least delay the onset.

I have taken some time to investigate clinics and research on Alzeheimers and I do not yet see affordable options. I do not want to merely be a piece of data and live the remainder of my life in limbo. I want to know that I will be involved in treatments. Please keep the ethical testing framework in mind as your write. Many (like I did with HD) will run out and test, but that too can prove detrimental to health. Also, I hope you will point out ways to identify good clinics that support the patient through the ups and downs of treatments.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?