Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ryan McCormick, M.D.'s avatar

Wow this is staggering, but sounds right intuitively. I did a post on the Rutgers study recently finding way more nanoplastics than previously thought in bottled water. I agree that reducing bottled water use would be a low hanging, highly impactful, and environmentally sound priority for individuals and policy leaders.

In the meantime I use a countertop reverse osmosis filter for drinking water which theoretically “is designed to reduce impurities from the water down to 1/10,000 of a micron. That’s ten times smaller than a nanoparticle if my math is correct.” While RO membranes might introduce some nanoplastics in the end filtration product, I doubt this approaches the amount seen in the Rutgers study of typical bottled water people drink.

A complementary deep dive if desired:

https://mccormickmd.substack.com/p/surprising-levels-of-microplastics

And vote, vote, vote… and make our environment and planet the most important consideration among many others which stir up misplaced passion.

Expand full comment
Franklin Tessler, MD's avatar

Thank you for posting, Eric. I'll have to read the paper when I have more time, but this is frightening. Unfortunately, my confidence that anything will be done to mitigate the problem globally is low, so it will be helpful to know if there's anything individuals can do.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts