Ahh...I get a sense that Substack is concerned about the proliferation of covid critical Substacks like Alex Berenson's (and my own) and wants to set up a counternarrative. Well, how about you start with answering one simple question:
WHY on earth does ANY doctor think it's a good idea to tell the body's own cells to produce an *antigen* that the body is then being trained to attack?
How on earth is this safe for every man, woman, and child on the planet, especially when some people have overactive immune systems?
My issue is not with vaccines in general, but this ridiculous idea that it's safe to get the body's cells to produce a protein it doesn't need, in order to train the immune system against it.
Don't tell me the mRNA just stays in the arm because it doesn't. Not with everyone.
Here's another question: WHY are doctors like you ignoring VAERS data and all the vaccine safety signals?
It's a summary of a long article that posits that everyone in public health knows its impossible to eradicate coronaviruses with a vaccine, and why that is...step by step.
That too. You'd think that the guy promoting boosters might stop to question WHY 6-month boosters are even necessary if the covid vaccine technology is that great.
At least with yearly flu shots they are targeting different strains and admit they are only somewhat effective in preventing flu - nor did they try to block people from going out in public who did not get a flu shot.
1 flu shot per year vs. now...what? At least 3 shots of covid vaccines and that's just for the original strain? Now they are saying we'll need 3 more shots of a different covid vaccine for the new strain? So we're at 6 shots and counting and barely a year has gone by. Where's the critical thinking?
PS I got a polio vaccine as a child and I never need to get vaccinated for it ever again.
Would that be Eric Topol of The Scripps Research Institute- La Jolla, California, United States
Let's follow the money trail shall we? Not to hard to figure this out folks.
Gates Foundation Awards $50 Million to Scripps Research
January 30, 2020
Scripps Research has announced a five-year, $50 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in support of efforts to fight malaria and tuberculosis and address emerging global health threats such as the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).
This is the kind of thing I'd like to see addressed by people like Topol.
What is your response to the BMJ article on the Pfizer trial whistleblower or the FDA's 55 year delay in releasing documentation? Does anything seem strange to you?
What is the justification behind completely ignoring natural immunity in the US?
What is the justification for ignoring vitamin D?
What is the justification for continuing the use of remdesevir even when it's been proven to be neither safe nor effective?
If the vaccine is one of the safest vaccines developed, why do they still demand liability waivers?
Why don't the public health officials acknowledge risk stratification and the fact that children have close to zero risk?
Do you support the public health claims there is no early treatment, and people should go home when sick and only seek help if their lips turn blue?
I'd like to see topics like this addressed by 'scientists'
These are vital questions. I trust that the Doctor has the humility and courage to answer them.
What boggles the mind is that people who were not part of the trials (still ongoing and untethered from the original control group) are being forcibly compelled to vaccinate. That includes recovered people and pregnant women. Never mind whatever rushed assessments were made for justifying the vaccination of children, who are least at risk and for whom there is a compelling reason to hold back! It is morally unconscionable. It's bad enough that any are being forced to partake in an ongoing experiment at all, as it is.
Here is something that is perplexing me. I got Covid during a Delta wave and recovered. I am now being forced to vaccinate with Pfizer, which was "tailored" for the wild strain spike and has been demonstrated to have limited efficacy against Delta. What efficacy there is has also been shown to wane within six months. Why on earth should I be forced to inject myself with something that isn't going to immunise me against something which I have already had and overcome? There's a double redundancy here. Wrong strain, plus innoculation after-the-fact. Where is the logic in that? It's like taking hangover medicine a week after going on a bender and then thinking it's going to help with the migraine that you might get next week. But this is much more serious, isn't it? Those possible vaccine side effects are not trivial, and it's cavalier to just tell people to "do it anyway", don't you think?
There's no logic in getting a vaccine in your case. I know a 26 year old and a 19 year old who died within a day of getting the vaccine, and neither had comorbidities.
"Ground truth" takes on a new meaning when you grind the truth and make it unrecognizable.
Looking at the welcome you have received in the comment section here, looks like you are going to tuck tail and run away. Block comments and censor like on twitter?
Robert F. Kennedy has challenged any and all scientists, doctors, or lawyers to a public debate on vaccine safety. Finally, Dershowitz took on the challenge when wimps like Eric Topol would not. Here is what happened: https://youtu.be/IfnJi7yLKgE
Welcome to Substack! Try to remember, unlike Twitter, we believe in the first amendment and look forward to reading your articles and educated opinions. While at the same time I hope you are willing to give dissenting opinions the same respect. If not, stay on Twitter where those dissenting opinions are censored and there is a one-way dialog, which is worthless.
Hey Eric, remember when Jim Kunstler wrote this about you?
"I’ll tell you what’s really funny: the new Sam Harris “Making Sense” podcast with Dr. Eric Topol, veep of Scripps Research. These two just can’t make sense of why the folks outside their Southern California smuggery bubble have any reservations about getting vaxed-up against Covid-19. It’s like a mental illness to them — all these selfish, Trump-driven, flag-smooching ignoramuses beyond the pale of Wokery, who are putting at risk their science-loving betters in the PhD hives of the New Normal, while that King Kong of Covid variants (code-name Delta) rages through the hillsides and canyons beneath Mulholland Drive. The insolence! Can’t these morons just follow simple instructions (available 24/7 at CNN)?"
Hope you don't mind a skeptical question: You state "And to lay it out, I have no relationship or financial conflicts with any pharmaceutical company or vaccine manufacturer."
The Scripps website, at the donor page, shows the EIN. I looked up the 990 filing from 2018 as a sample. It does not list donors. It does show a book value of $221M for investments (Path VII of Schedule D). Is the Institute funded significantly from pharmaceutical companies or trade associations? Does its investment portfolio include pharmaceutical company stock?
Steve Kirsch challenged you to a public debate. You blocked him. Pussy.
why don't you debate him ?? bring something besides derogatory language and youtube links
Yeah, Eric. Debate me here. I'll eat your lunch.
And you, Rohn... Watch the damn video.
Ahh...I get a sense that Substack is concerned about the proliferation of covid critical Substacks like Alex Berenson's (and my own) and wants to set up a counternarrative. Well, how about you start with answering one simple question:
WHY on earth does ANY doctor think it's a good idea to tell the body's own cells to produce an *antigen* that the body is then being trained to attack?
How on earth is this safe for every man, woman, and child on the planet, especially when some people have overactive immune systems?
My issue is not with vaccines in general, but this ridiculous idea that it's safe to get the body's cells to produce a protein it doesn't need, in order to train the immune system against it.
Don't tell me the mRNA just stays in the arm because it doesn't. Not with everyone.
Here's another question: WHY are doctors like you ignoring VAERS data and all the vaccine safety signals?
Finally, please read and give a cogent answer to this: https://wholistic.substack.com/p/if-theres-one-thing-you-need-to-read
It's a summary of a long article that posits that everyone in public health knows its impossible to eradicate coronaviruses with a vaccine, and why that is...step by step.
How about this simple question: If the vaccines worked, why are we still in a (declared) pandemic?
That too. You'd think that the guy promoting boosters might stop to question WHY 6-month boosters are even necessary if the covid vaccine technology is that great.
At least with yearly flu shots they are targeting different strains and admit they are only somewhat effective in preventing flu - nor did they try to block people from going out in public who did not get a flu shot.
1 flu shot per year vs. now...what? At least 3 shots of covid vaccines and that's just for the original strain? Now they are saying we'll need 3 more shots of a different covid vaccine for the new strain? So we're at 6 shots and counting and barely a year has gone by. Where's the critical thinking?
PS I got a polio vaccine as a child and I never need to get vaccinated for it ever again.
Would that be Eric Topol of The Scripps Research Institute- La Jolla, California, United States
Let's follow the money trail shall we? Not to hard to figure this out folks.
Gates Foundation Awards $50 Million to Scripps Research
January 30, 2020
Scripps Research has announced a five-year, $50 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in support of efforts to fight malaria and tuberculosis and address emerging global health threats such as the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).
https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/gates-foundation-awards-50-million-to-scripps-research
Purpose
To establish a Center of Excellence for structure-guided immunogen design for global health-related problems
DIVISION
Global Health
DATE NOVEMBER 2020
REGION SERVED
GLOBAL
COMMITTED AMOUNT
$16,931,534
GRANT TOPIC
Discovery and Translational Sciences,
Malaria
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2020/11/INV004923
why are we fighting malaria when we have Artemisia annua (bitter wormwood) oh wait bc there is no pharma money to be made
Who wants to bet on how long it will take for Topol to ask Substack to turn comments off on his posts? 🙂
Probably end of the day.
Reposting this. Bought and paid for. https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/gates-foundation-awards-50-million-to-scripps-research This ain't science, it's propaganda. We need to take the money out of the conversation and unfortunately, you are knee-deep in it. Conflicted, biased, or just greedy.
Absurd. You obviously don’t know Eric.
He is selling failed boosters. What more do you need to know about Eric?
Welcome. I will read your articles.
However, you need to debate Kirsch (et al) or your credibility will suffer.
Show us how good you are.
This isn’t the “safe space” of Twitter where the Censors have your back (at least, not yet).
This is the real world where you actually have to contend with disagreement.
Please do.
How could mRNA vaccines bee deemed safe for developing babies and mothers after only 5 months use?
This is the kind of thing I'd like to see addressed by people like Topol.
What is your response to the BMJ article on the Pfizer trial whistleblower or the FDA's 55 year delay in releasing documentation? Does anything seem strange to you?
What is the justification behind completely ignoring natural immunity in the US?
What is the justification for ignoring vitamin D?
What is the justification for continuing the use of remdesevir even when it's been proven to be neither safe nor effective?
If the vaccine is one of the safest vaccines developed, why do they still demand liability waivers?
Why don't the public health officials acknowledge risk stratification and the fact that children have close to zero risk?
Do you support the public health claims there is no early treatment, and people should go home when sick and only seek help if their lips turn blue?
I'd like to see topics like this addressed by 'scientists'
They want longer now. I think it was over 70 years in the last briefing.
These are vital questions. I trust that the Doctor has the humility and courage to answer them.
What boggles the mind is that people who were not part of the trials (still ongoing and untethered from the original control group) are being forcibly compelled to vaccinate. That includes recovered people and pregnant women. Never mind whatever rushed assessments were made for justifying the vaccination of children, who are least at risk and for whom there is a compelling reason to hold back! It is morally unconscionable. It's bad enough that any are being forced to partake in an ongoing experiment at all, as it is.
Or 5 year olds
(See VAERS 1890705)
Here is something that is perplexing me. I got Covid during a Delta wave and recovered. I am now being forced to vaccinate with Pfizer, which was "tailored" for the wild strain spike and has been demonstrated to have limited efficacy against Delta. What efficacy there is has also been shown to wane within six months. Why on earth should I be forced to inject myself with something that isn't going to immunise me against something which I have already had and overcome? There's a double redundancy here. Wrong strain, plus innoculation after-the-fact. Where is the logic in that? It's like taking hangover medicine a week after going on a bender and then thinking it's going to help with the migraine that you might get next week. But this is much more serious, isn't it? Those possible vaccine side effects are not trivial, and it's cavalier to just tell people to "do it anyway", don't you think?
There's no logic in getting a vaccine in your case. I know a 26 year old and a 19 year old who died within a day of getting the vaccine, and neither had comorbidities.
Don't do it.
It’s ScIEnCE (the kind that is always right, does not evolve, etc.)
Fuck right off, Pfizer shill. Don't you have enough captured media platforms to infest?
Is that you, Karl?
Now I have a machinegun. Ho ho ho.
"Ground truth" takes on a new meaning when you grind the truth and make it unrecognizable.
Looking at the welcome you have received in the comment section here, looks like you are going to tuck tail and run away. Block comments and censor like on twitter?
https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/to-prevent-one-covid-19-related-death
Robert F. Kennedy has challenged any and all scientists, doctors, or lawyers to a public debate on vaccine safety. Finally, Dershowitz took on the challenge when wimps like Eric Topol would not. Here is what happened: https://youtu.be/IfnJi7yLKgE
Welcome to Substack! Try to remember, unlike Twitter, we believe in the first amendment and look forward to reading your articles and educated opinions. While at the same time I hope you are willing to give dissenting opinions the same respect. If not, stay on Twitter where those dissenting opinions are censored and there is a one-way dialog, which is worthless.
I might suggest that you read https://alexberenson.substack.com/ along with https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/. You may not agree with everything they say, I don't, but these are some of the most informed people in the world.
Hey Eric, remember when Jim Kunstler wrote this about you?
"I’ll tell you what’s really funny: the new Sam Harris “Making Sense” podcast with Dr. Eric Topol, veep of Scripps Research. These two just can’t make sense of why the folks outside their Southern California smuggery bubble have any reservations about getting vaxed-up against Covid-19. It’s like a mental illness to them — all these selfish, Trump-driven, flag-smooching ignoramuses beyond the pale of Wokery, who are putting at risk their science-loving betters in the PhD hives of the New Normal, while that King Kong of Covid variants (code-name Delta) rages through the hillsides and canyons beneath Mulholland Drive. The insolence! Can’t these morons just follow simple instructions (available 24/7 at CNN)?"
Lol! Lots more here, dude:
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/in-a-hall-of-mirrors-you-have-to-break-some-glass-to-see-clearly/
Alternate titles for this substack:
Pound Sand, which is what this lying monster can do.
F**K Off, which is what everyone should say to this filthy pharma shill.
Mo Money! which is all he cares about, as his pockets fill with blood money.
Any other ideas out there?
your derogatory language precludes any credibility you might have had / what's wrong with you that you can't speak respectfully in a public forum ??
He deserves every bit of it.
prove it
Lol! Classic dodge. I'm not your intern. Do your own research.
Rohn likes Flavor-Aid.
If vaccines are such a good idea WHY ARE WHITE HOUSE PERSONNEL EXEMPTED?
Hope you don't mind a skeptical question: You state "And to lay it out, I have no relationship or financial conflicts with any pharmaceutical company or vaccine manufacturer."
The Scripps website, at the donor page, shows the EIN. I looked up the 990 filing from 2018 as a sample. It does not list donors. It does show a book value of $221M for investments (Path VII of Schedule D). Is the Institute funded significantly from pharmaceutical companies or trade associations? Does its investment portfolio include pharmaceutical company stock?
Great question. I'll wait with you 'til doomsday for the forthcoming answer.